Wednesday, January 2, 2013

Cities chart course through pension morass

(AP) ? In Philadelphia, pension costs doubled in a single decade. Cities in Rhode Island dimmed streetlights, raised taxes and put off road repairs. Stockton, Calif., fell into bankruptcy.

Unpaid bills from decades of retirement promises made to public workers, combined with a lackluster economy and steep Wall Street losses, have built up a financial mountain that threatens to overwhelm budgets and operations in cities and counties across the country.

While it hasn't gotten the attention of the "fiscal cliff" in Washington, the pension crisis at City Hall could have similar effects as mayors are forced to raise taxes, cut government services or renege on retirement promises made to police officers, firefighters, teachers and other public workers.

"It's not about assigning blame, because look, these numbers are staring us in the face," said Allan Fung, the mayor of Cranston, R.I., where the pension fund is only 16 percent funded and the city needs $270 million to meet its pension obligations. "It's a dire situation for us and for many cities and towns around the country. It's a recipe for disaster at the worst economic time possible."

Collectively, American municipalities face nearly $600 billion in unfunded pension obligations. The problem arose in many cities because local leaders for decades failed to properly fund retirement systems. Longer-living retirees and rising health care costs drove costs higher.

Then came the economic downturn, in which investment losses decimated even relatively well-off pension funds. San Diego's unfunded pension liability surged from $1.3 billion in 2008 to $2.11 billion in 2009.

In Philadelphia, the city's annual pension costs are now calculated to be well over $500 million ? up from $200 million a decade ago. The city's total annual budget is $3.5 billion and it faces a gap of $4.5 billion between what is promised to workers and what is set aside to pay for those benefits.

Unions argue workers aren't to blame for poor investments or past failures to fund pension systems. Anthony Martin, a Chicago police lieutenant and trustee of his public pension fund, said he has seen records going back to 1877 showing the retirement system was underfunded even then.

"You have a dysfunction in government that is hard to overcome," Martin said. "Year after year they kicked the can down the road."

There's some evidence that may be changing, however, as mayors find they can no longer ignore mounting pension bills. Providence Mayor Angel Taveras successfully negotiated concessions with unions and retirees to shave $178 million off the city's future pension obligations. The city had faced $903 million in future pension costs, which Taveras had said could force the city into bankruptcy.

"Through collaboration, we have pulled Rhode Island's capital city back from the brink of bankruptcy while sparing taxpayers the unnecessary expense of a long, costly legal challenge that threatened our future," he said after the police union voted to accept the agreement, which will suspend pension increases and eliminate the practice of giving some workers compounded 5 or 6 percent pension increases annually.

The negotiated settlement is among the first of its kind in the country, and could foreshadow similar deals in other cities.

States around the country face even more expensive problems in their own retirement systems ? $1.4 trillion at last estimate. But mayors face a pension puzzle that can be even more challenging. State retirement benefits are often set through statute, but local pensions are typically negotiated through collective bargaining, making them much harder to break unilaterally.

Rhode Island had one of the nation's worst pension problems before lawmakers passed a sweeping overhaul in 2011 that suspended pension increases, raised retirement ages and created a new benefit that merged traditional pensions with 401(k) plans. The moves ? now being challenged in court ? will save an estimated $4 billion in coming decades.

The changes affect teachers, state workers and municipal employees and retirees who participate in the state's pension system. Despite pleas from mayors and Gov. Lincoln Chafee, municipal pension plans were left out of the overhaul. Top lawmakers said it was up to mayors to negotiate pension concessions.

In Illinois, state law sets retirement benefits for all public employees, including city workers and Chicago Public Schools teachers. That means Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel must head to the Capitol in Springfield to lobby for any changes. In May, he told lawmakers that if they didn't pass reforms he would be forced to choose between letting the funds go bankrupt or increasing property taxes by 150 percent.

"As long as I am mayor of Chicago, that is a burden I refuse to put on the backs of our taxpayers," Emanuel told members of the House pension committee.

Bankruptcy is another option ? though one officials are loathe to consider.

The state-appointed receiver in charge of Central Falls, R.I., filed for bankruptcy on behalf of the city in 2011. He went on to slash pensions for retirees by up to 55 percent. The retirees had refused to agree to take voluntary cuts, though the receiver warned that he was prepared to take unilateral action. He said the retirees' choice was between a "haircut or a beheading."

"They stuck it to us," said Bruce Ogni, who retired as a captain from the Central Falls Police Department. His $41,000 pension was cut to $29,000. "We were told if we didn't take the deal they might stop the pensions altogether. We took the hit for other people's mistakes."

Stockton, Calif., filed for bankruptcy protection in June, becoming the largest American city to take such a drastic step. Officials cited the housing collapse, a struggling local economy and pensions. While pensions in Stockton won't be impacted by the bankruptcy filing, health benefits for employees and retirees are on the table. The unfunded liability for those benefits stands at $417 million.

An August report by Moody's Investors Service that predicted more bankruptcies and defaults in California as cities and towns reel from the collapse of the housing market, the downturn and rising pension costs.

Residents in San Jose voted this summer to cut the pension benefits for city workers. San Diego residents approved similar changes in June, voting to change the way pensions are calculated and place all new hires ? except police officers ? into a 401(k)-style plan.

Jack Canning, a 62-year-old civil engineer for the city of San Diego, said pay cuts and freezes forced him to postpone retirement for two years until he turns 67.

Still, he considers himself lucky. Newer employees with inferior pension benefits resent veterans like him.

"People say stuff to me like, 'Why are we holding onto pension benefits that you guys have and we don't?'" he said.

___

Contributing to this report were Associated Press writers Sara Burnett in Chicago, Elliot Spagat in San Diego, Ben Nuckols in Washington, Christina Almeida in Atlanta, Marc Levy in Harrisburg, Amanda Lee Myers in Cincinnati and Kevin McGill in New Orleans.

Associated Press

Source: http://hosted2.ap.org/APDEFAULT/386c25518f464186bf7a2ac026580ce7/Article_2013-01-02-Broken%20Budgets-Municipal%20Pensions/id-63a0cf1ac0594e3790a89fedf56f8fac

april fools pranks livan hernandez soledad o brien mega ball lottery winner lottery numbers mega millions lottery

Live Chat w/Jon Alter (talking-points-memo)

Share With Friends: Share on FacebookTweet ThisPost to Google-BuzzSend on GmailPost to Linked-InSubscribe to This Feed | Rss To Twitter | Politics - Top Stories Stories, RSS Feeds and Widgets via Feedzilla.

Source: http://news.feedzilla.com/en_us/stories/politics/top-stories/274417605?client_source=feed&format=rss

mega mill power ball april fools pranks livan hernandez soledad o brien mega ball lottery winner

Despite deal, taxes will rise for most

WASHINGTON (AP) ? While the tax package that Congress passed New Year's Day will protect 99 percent of Americans from an income tax increase, most of them will still end up paying more federal taxes in 2013.

That's because the legislation did nothing to prevent a temporary reduction in the Social Security payroll tax from expiring. In 2012, that 2-percentage-point cut in the payroll tax was worth about $1,000 to a worker making $50,000 a year.

The Tax Policy Center, a nonpartisan Washington research group, estimates that 77 percent of American households will face higher federal taxes in 2013 under the agreement negotiated between President Barack Obama and Senate Republicans. High-income families will feel the biggest tax increases, but many middle- and low-income families will pay higher taxes too.

Households making between $40,000 and $50,000 will face an average tax increase of $579 in 2013, according to the Tax Policy Center's analysis. Households making between $50,000 and $75,000 will face an average tax increase of $822.

"For most people, it's just the payroll tax," said Roberton Williams, a senior fellow at the Tax Policy Center.

The tax increases could be a lot higher. A huge package of tax cuts first enacted under President George W. Bush was scheduled to expire Tuesday as part of the "fiscal cliff." The Bush-era tax cuts lowered taxes for families at every income level, reduced investment taxes and the estate tax, and enhanced a number of tax credits, including a $1,000-per-child credit.

The package passed Tuesday by the Senate and House extends most the Bush-era tax cuts for individuals making less than $400,000 and married couples making less than $450,000.

Obama said the deal "protects 98 percent of Americans and 97 percent of small business owners from a middle-class tax hike. While neither Democrats nor Republicans got everything they wanted, this agreement is the right thing to do for our country."

The income threshold covers more than 99 percent of all households, exceeding Obama's claim, according to the Tax Policy Center. However, the increase in payroll taxes will hit nearly every wage earner.

Social Security is financed by a 12.4 percent tax on wages up to $113,700, with employers paying half and workers paying the other half. Obama and Congress reduced the share paid by workers from 6.2 percent to 4.2 percent for 2011 and 2012, saving a typical family about $1,000 a year.

Obama pushed hard to enact the payroll tax cut for 2011 and to extend it through 2012. But it was never fully embraced by either party, and this time around, there was general agreement to let it expire.

The new tax package would increase the income tax rate from 35 percent to 39.6 percent on income above $400,000 for individuals and $450,000 for married couples. Investment taxes would increase for people who fall in the new top tax bracket.

High-income families will also pay higher taxes this year as part of Obama's 2010 health care law. As part of that law, a new 3.8 percent tax is being imposed on investment income for individuals making more than $200,000 a year and couples making more than $250,000.

Together, the new tax package and Obama's health care law will produce significant tax increases for many high-income families.

For 2013, households making between $500,000 and $1 million would get an average tax increase of $14,812, according to the Tax Policy Center analysis. Households making more than $1 million would get an average tax increase of $170,341.

"If you're rich, you're almost certain to get a big tax increase," Williams said.

___

Follow Stephen Ohlemacher on Twitter: http://twitter.com/stephenatap

Deal moves US away from fiscal cliff - for nowWASHINGTON (AP) -- An emergency deal reached after weeks of rancorous negotiations will keep the U.S. from driving off the so-called fiscal cliff, but higher taxes and continued political bickering in Washington threaten to shake the fragile U.

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/despite-deal-taxes-rise-most-americans-080605126--finance.html

unlv sam young ncaa bracket ramon sessions portland trail blazers nba trade blagojevich

LG 55-inch OLED TV available for pre-order in Korea this week, ready to ship next month

LG 55inch OLED TV available for preorder in Korea this week, ready to ship next month

If you spent the entirety of 2012 with 11 million won ($10,000 US) in your savings account and begging LG to take it, we'd wager that you were hoping that the Korean manufacturer's 55-inch WRGB OLED HDTV -- announced at last year's CES -- would make its way to your doorstep in a reasonable amount of time. Whether or not you feel that one revolution of the earth around the sun can be called reasonable, LG will begin taking pre-orders for the breathtaking screen in Korea on Thursday (January 3rd) and will ship the first batch to early adopters next month. There's still no word on when we can expect to see one in other parts of the world, but this -- as well as its stamp of approval by the FCC -- is a good sign that the wait may soon be over. Check out the full press release after the break.

Continue reading LG 55-inch OLED TV available for pre-order in Korea this week, ready to ship next month

Filed under: , ,

Comments

Source: LG

Source: http://feeds.engadget.com/~r/weblogsinc/engadget/~3/ftKdFMwIHq4/

oregon ducks oregon ducks rob gronkowski Coughing eddie murphy Stephanie Bongiovi stanford football

Samsung's CES TV Surprise Is Blowing Our Minds

The great Vegas gadget circus is only days away, and we've got a feeling big, beautiful TVs are going to be front and center. 4K! OLED! Wonderful stuff. But Samsung is teasing something that's either brilliant or insane. We can't tell. More »


Source: http://feeds.gawker.com/~r/gizmodo/full/~3/YUQaQmYDatU/samsungs-ces-tv-surprise-is-blowing-our-minds

space shuttle new york courtney upshaw catch me if you can delmon young arrested the raven the raven zerg rush

Cyber spies mean business: ASIO ? Regulatory Cyber Security: The ...

From: Financial Review

Christopher Joye

Australian Security Intelligence Organisation director-general David Irvine has personally warned chief executives and company directors of the risks cyber attacks pose for business and privatised power, water, electricity, transport and communication networks.

National security authorities are concerned that business in general, and specifically those which own essential services, including some ex-government utilities, lack adequate safeguards against cyber espionage. Software firm Symantec estimates cyber attacks cost society $4.5?billion a year ? more than burglary and assault.

?Electronic intelligence gathering is being used against Australia on a massive scale to extract confidential information from governments, the private sector and ordinary individuals? Mr Irvine said.

?It is used to steal intellectual property, all kinds of defence secrets, weapon designs and commercially advantageous information.?

At private dinners and meetings Mr Irvine and officials from the Defence Signals Directorate have met CEOs and directors to explain the risks of cyber espionage and terrorism because they believe some chief technology officers are not taking the problem seriously.

To protect business, ASIO supports Parliament introducing national security legislation making changes to four laws which would require telephone companies and internet service providers to store for at least two years basic information, such as the type, time, duration and identifiers of messages. ASIO?s concern is that the data, which is the minimum it says it needs to investigate threats, is being discarded by smaller telecommunication companies.

Civil libertarians argue the changes would be an unjustified invasion of privacy and raise the spectre of a security state.

Australia?s intelligence agencies also want telcos to abide by a set of basic security standards in the same way banks must respect capital controls set by regulators.

ASIO and the DSD are worried that cyber attacks by foreign governments for business reasons are coming at a significant economic cost.

State-directed intrusions were ?the biggest threat to networks, which makes sense when you think about [state] resources?, said DSD deputy director of cyber and information security Mike Burgess.

?In practice, at least 65 per cent of cyber intrusions .?.?. have an economic focus,? he said.

When BHP Billiton tried to merge with Rio Tinto in 2010, the networks of the companies and their advisers were broken into by Chinese hackers.

China-based hackers infiltrated seven law firms involved in BHP?s subsequent bid for the world?s largest potash producer.

In February 2011, Chinese agents allegedly penetrated the parliamentary email systems of 10 federal ministers, including Prime Minister Julia Gillard.

Defence Minister Stephen Smith said that in the first nine months of 2012 the number of serious cyber incidents jumped 52 per cent from the same period in 2011.

Officials caution that since most cyber penetrations go unnoticed and the theft of digital assets is a ?gun that does not smoke?, the damage is often significantly understated.

While security officials do not want to publicly identify the hackers for diplomatic reasons, many believe the Chinese Communist Party?s ?mercantilist? approach to controlling international trade is the cause of most state-based cyber intrusions of Australian assets.

?It?s relatively easy to link the bulk of attacks on our clients to businesses that are working with China as a customer, or competing against them,? said one leading Australian security expert, who asked not to be named.

A former deputy chief of the Royal Australian Air Force, John Blackburn, said: ?Australian businesses are chronically underprepared for the spectrum of cyber threats they face. While government understands the gravity of the risks, the wider community and many in business do not.?

Attorney-General Nicola Roxon has referred the national security legislation to a parliamentary committee.

Source: http://www.thecre.com/fisma/?p=4425

eli whitney blake griffin dunk on kendrick perkins kendrick perkins steve jones emily maynard kola boof burmese python

Top 10 Gaming Controversies of 2012! - YouTube

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate sovietdragon330's comment.

Sign in

Source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=54s_jyjMUxY

huntingtons disease rob the firm new york philharmonic marines urinating on taliban critics choice awards super pac